Alternative to direct immersion heaters are circulation heaters, indirect immersion heaters, heat exchangers, and electric infrared heaters.
Circulation heaters: They heat liquids, and gases while circulating them through a closed loop provide control, and reduce the risk of contamination.
Indirect immersion heaters: They use a heating element inside a sheath or jacket, transfer the heat to the medium indirectly, and are suitable for corrosive or viscous fluids.
Heat Exchangers: It transfers the heat between two mediums efficiently without direct contact and is used in industrial and HVAC applications.
Electric Infrared Heaters: They provide targeted heating without direct immersion and are feasible for surface or localized heating needs.
Prior to deciding on a drywell heater over a different type of heater, direct or indirect, assess the probable failure costs. Does the added expense of the chosen heater outweigh the logistical inconvenience to gain access (through draining) to direct immersion heaters when replacement or maintenance is necessary? Some resource aspects to consider are:
ü The tank size and liquid storage or replacement
ü The heater’s cost, physical size, life expectancy, and the cost of installation
ü Safety concerns, such as toxicity or corrosion during drainage or replacement
ü Downtimes during processing and product loss or spoilage
ü Necessary equipment and personnel requirements during transfer and service
In summary, the use of direct immersion heaters is always the preferred method to an indirect method, when practical or possible. Heater costs and size are minimized. Additionally, virtually all power is generated to heat the fluid.
Nonetheless, if a heater needs to remain segregated from the fluid because of sheath contaminant or corrosion concerns, or the necessity to service or remove the heater without drainage of the tank, a drywell heater might be a viable alternative.